His effective use of pathos made his readers feel some of the anger he felt. Mark Twain manages to carry his sarcastic tone up to the very end of the essay. Twain argues that man has always been, and will continue to be cruel.
To reveal how man is cruel in nature, Twain uses the example of a cat playing with a mouse. If there are bad people, there can also be good people. Also, at this point in his life, Twain was also very open about his overall disdain for the human race in general, perhaps due to circumstances regarding his family and life experiences, though it has been debated that Twain had no more of a troubled life than most normal people Byrne An example is when he compared the gathering habits of man in comparison to animals.
In this essay he shows a harsher side of himself. The standout comparison in this essay was between the anaconda and earl that the anaconda will only eat what is needed by it and kill only what it will eat but the earl is cruel and could kill as many as it could basically for the sake of pleasure.
These truths demonstrated that some of the logic behind his arguments was successful.
He concluded that man is greedy while animals are not. Because people generally do not enjoy being criticized, using humor helps to illuminate negative traits of humanity without being directly offensive.
This is all done very sarcastically and borderline-mockingly; and the end result is a master work in the art of satire.
Twain to call a man foolish because the achievements the human brain has accomplished cannot be compared to the brain of an animal because if not for the great brain of a man, even Mr.
He gave us the feeling that he wanted the reader to believe that a man is such a degraded creature that his worth should be below animals. By comparison, when offered seven young calves into its cage, an anaconda chooses only to kill and eat one of the calves, leaving the rest unharmed.
In my point of view the comparison between animals and man were not done properly because Animals also do some awful things to each other.
There are a lot of positive traits of humans as well; but he goes into detail of only the negative traits of humans.
Ridiculing the corrupt values within society, without directly insulting people demonstrated his effective use of satire. He shows signs of a joking tone at times but it is clear that he is not ridiculing the entire subject just for the sake of a cheap laugh or for stupid ridicule; it is obvious that he wants things to change.
Twain provides several sound reasons for stating that humans are worse than animals, all conveyed in an effective manner.
Men harbor avarice, cruelty, and a knack for destruction; traits that Twain argues are present in no other animal. He was successful in making people see the error of their ways, and acknowledgement is the first step toward improvement.
To begin with he tries to gain credibility by using false authority and presenting himself as a scientist.
In addition his writing persuaded his readers to examine their own morals in an indirect way. He persuades his readers to examine the ill traits of humanity and see the world through his eyes. This essay will make you wonder about the bad qualities which is embedded in a human being but I thing that Mr.
He observes that humans are the only species to possess a moral sense, yet they use it to perform evil. His writing style was biased by not including any favorable qualities that people possess.
His writing style engaged people on an emotional level, and was able to highlight destructive behaviors that conflict with having good morals. Twain, in this The damned human race essay has exaggerated the bad qualities of a human being by depicting them as completely worthless, wasteful and a corrupt creature and not even considered the good qualities which can be only found in a man and not the higher animals.
While most believe this to be a positive trait of humans, Twain immediately follows this statement by stating that humans are the only species to kill one another for their countries, writing: Mark Twain compares the behavior of different animals to human beings to prove it against to the Darwinian Theory.
While the points that Mark Twain makes in his essay are for all intents and purposes true, and he conveys his beliefs in a very effective manner, the essay as a whole is not a successful argument, largely because he primarily uses only one of the three main means of persuasion.
Yet his idea that mankind are all immoral, persuades readers to disagree.Critical Essay of Mark Twain’s “The Damned Human Race” Mark Twain, through a heavy dose of satire, irony, and a not-so-subtle attempt at the scientific method, provides readers with an effective, but flawed, argument as to why humans are the lowest of animals in his essay The Damned Human Race.
The essay the damned human race has been written by Mark Twain. In this essay Mark Twain uses satire, most notably sarcasm, to show that the world is more. The Damned Human Race “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” by Tom Regan and “The Damned Human Race” by Mark Twain are more similar than different.
Both of the authors are informing the readers about the mentality of some human beings in regard to animals. Within his essay of The Damned Human Race, author Mark Twain powerfully declares that the human race is both flawed and corrupt, and that people actually should be classified as "lower animals" rather than the formerly known "higher animals.".
View Essay - week 3 Critical Evaluation Essay Discussion from ENGLISH at American Public University.
Thesis Statement: Within Mark Twains essay The Damned Human Race Twain analyzes the different98%(56). In his story, "The Damned Human Race," it is obvious that his target is the whole human race. By disagreeing with Darwin's theory of the ascent of man from the lower animals, Twain develops his own ideas and pursues to prove them right in contrast to Darwin.Download