To what extent is sports being damaged by money

And it seems even more unconvincing when the host for the following Olympic comes to mind, especially when Greece is considered as more developed than China. Even in the long run, countries struggle to maintain these stadiums and buildings which grow redundant after the event, a sheer waste of resources.

New construction requires demolishing or relocating existing houses and offices, and often people are not compensated adequately. To what extent is sport being damaged by money?

As a result, we either have preposterous days like September 12, with the exhilarating choice of US v Tonga, Japan v Fiji and Italy v Romania, or grotesque mismatches. The interest stimulated in sports in the country also helps in producing competent sporting talents in the future.

Perhaps a clearer topic sentence would help. Also, even if the event is a success, host countries may not be able to escape negative publicity, especially if they have skeletons in their closet. All this is happening because of the greed of earning more money, and nothing else.

What a wonderful definition of "clean"! There are many such unfair practices which exist in sports, most of which are motivated by financial gain.

In the fifth paragraph, the logic of the argument seems weird. Thus host countries face huge concerns in terms of vulnerability to terrorism and ensuring safety. Also with the international interest in the event, host countries may become tourist attractions, thus boosting hospitality and tourism industries.

Till then, it is better to patiently wait its turn. Mainly the drugs like Benzedrine and anabolic steroid are used by the athletes and players to increase their performance.

As it happened, "without a fight" was just how England did go down to the Springboks that evening. Even the hallowed Marylebone Cricket Club has now succumbed in sordid fashion. However, they successfully gained recognition through hosting it.

This is supposed to generate more jobs, greater income and better standards of living. It is claimed, mostly by non-economists, that hosting sporting events result in the economic growth of the nation. This leads us to believe that sporting events bring about huge benefits to a nation, however we ignore the underlying countless problems which inevitably accompany the hosting rights.

Instead, only when a country is sure of its capacity to weather any storms hosting sporting events might bring, should it compete in the bidding race.

As a result, there is no need for them to take another job to earn their living. Locals who mostly belong to middle-income families do not avail or benefit from these expensive facilities. It has become fashionable to deride the sporting spirit, the Corinthian ethos, amateurism.

No one misses the days when county cricketers lived in genteel poverty at best, and the greatest footballers in the land were kept in their place by the maximum wage. Sometimes, a team intentionally loses or scores low, in order to obtain perceived competitive advantage in the future for example, earning a high draft pick, getting a weaker opponent in the next round of the tournament, etc.

However, the example of China wasting money on maintenance is not linked to how it would disadvantage people. This is especially true of developing nations like India where income disparity is alarming and given limited government resources, diverting resources to sporting events will widen this income gap.

Money has made sporting events as well as athletes more popular. When that becomes too intellectually demanding, we will presumably have 10 or Five. Performance-enhancing drugs refer to any substance taken to perform better athletically.

While this may be true to a certain extent, the opportunity cost of investing in sports is huge. Thus, money has helped to improve the quality of sport and made the sporting events more competitive.

The sports writer David Conn has gruesomely detailed the fortunes made by football club directors. Today, we see a world driven by a fanatic enthusiasm for sports.TO WHAT EXTENT IS SPORT LIKE RELIGON This essay will discuss the extent of religion being like sport.

The main argument will be towards sport being like religion. Extracts from the following books have been used to gather information for this essay; Coakley (), Coakley and Pike (), OvermanRojek (), Weber (). May 15,  · Moreover, optimists claim that host nations, in spending enormous sums of money on their sporting facilities and sportsmen, thus improve the standard of sports in the country.

The interest stimulated in sports in the country also helps in producing competent sporting talents in the future.

Early emphasis on winning, making money, and the disruption of education can exceedingly affect ones desire to further participate in a sport later on in his/her life. More so, there has been a noticeable increase of extreme sports being broadcast on television today than ever before.

These changes caused me to ask the question: why. From the rising costs of players’ and coaches’ salaries to some team owners’ demands for new publicly financed stadiums, money has to a huge extent, commercialized the sports sector.

Match fixing; gambling, bribing and the use. To What Extent Is Sport Like Religion.

Is money ruining sports

TO WHAT EXTENT IS SPORT LIKE RELIGON This essay will discuss the extent of religion being like sport. The main argument will be towards sport being like religion.

Extracts from the following books have been used to gather information for this essay; Coakley (), Coakley and Pike (), Overman. Is money ruining sports. by Will C on September 10, - pm Everyone knows that professional athletes make more money than they ever need, but is that hurting the sport?

I think that money is slowing ruining the aspect of players playing for the love of the sport and now there playing for the money.

Download
To what extent is sports being damaged by money
Rated 4/5 based on 59 review